Mesalamine for the treatment of cancer

ABSTRACT

Methods of treating renal cancer, including renal cell carcinoma, using mesalamine are disclosed herein. Mesalamine can be administered as a monotherapy or as part of a comprehensive treatment program, which can also include administration with other anti-cancer drugs, surgical treatments or exposure to ionizing radiation.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of Indian Application 201621022475, filed on Jun. 30, 2016, the contents of which are hereby incorporated in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention is directed to the treatment of cancer, especially renal cell carcinoma, using mesalamine, optionally in combination with one or more additional cancer therapeutics.

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC, also known as hypernephroma) is a kidney cancer that originates in the lining of the proximal convoluted tubule, the very small tubes in the kidney that transport GF (glomerular filtrate) from the glomerulus to the descending limb of the nephron. RCC is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults, responsible for approximately 80% of cases. It is also known to be the most lethal of all the genitourinary tumors. Initial treatment is most commonly a radical or partial nephrectomy and remains the mainstay of curative treatment. Where the tumor is confined to the renal parenchyma, the five year survival rate is 60-70%, but this is lowered considerably once metastases have spread. It is relatively resistant to radiation therapy and chemotherapy, although some cases respond to immunotherapy.

Renal-cell carcinoma affects approximately 150,000 people worldwide each year, causing close to 78,000 deaths annually, and its incidence seems to be increasing. RCC is not a single entity, but rather comprises the class of tumors of renal epithelial origin. Extensive histological and molecular evaluation has resulted in the development of a consensus classification of different RCC subtypes: (i) conventional (clear-cell) renal cell carcinoma; (ii) papillary renal cell-carcinoma; (iii) chromophobe renal carcinoma; (iv) onco-cytoma; (v) collecting-duct carcinoma. Although most cases of RCC seem to occur sporadically, an inherited predisposition to renal cancer accounts for 1-4% of cases and could involve the same genes that cause sporadic renal cancer. Over the past two decades, studies of families with inherited RCC have laid the groundwork for the identification of seven hereditary renal cancer syndromes, and the predisposing genes for five of these have been identified. The surprisingly diverse nature of these genes implicates various mechanisms and biological pathways in RCC tumorigenesis.

RCC has been conventionally treated using surgery, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, and molecular-targeted therapy. Surgical resection remains the only known effective treatment for localized renal cell carcinoma, and it also is used for palliation in metastatic disease. Targeted therapy and immunomodulatory agents are considered standard of care in patients with metastatic disease.

Options for chemotherapy and endocrine-based approaches are limited, and no hormonal or chemotherapeutic regimen is accepted as a standard of care. Objective response rates with chemotherapy, either single-agent or combination, are usually lower than 15%. Therefore, various therapies have been evaluated.

The first agent, approved in late 2005, was sorafenib, after showing improvement in the second-line setting for progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo. Shortly thereafter, sunitinib was approved following a large phase III trial that also demonstrated improvement in PFS versus interferon-α (INFα) in the first-line setting. The next agent approved was the mechanistic target of rapamycin (serine/threonine kinase) (mTOR) inhibitor, temsirolimus, which was evaluated as a first-line therapy against INFα in patients, most of whom had poor-risk disease. This trial demonstrated an improvement in overall survival (OS) in patients receiving temsirolimus. Combination of temsirolimus and INFα showed no advantages over the mTOR inhibitor alone. Meanwhile, everolimus was the second mTOR inhibitor approved after second-line therapy showed improvement in PFS versus placebo in a clinical trial. Pazopanib and axitinib are the two newer tyrosine kinase inhibitors and were recently approved for treatment of metastatic RCC. Patients taking pazopanib exhibited improved PFS versus those taking placebo both in the first-line setting and for cytokine-refractory disease. axitinib was studied against sorafenib as a second-line agent and demonstrated improved PFS, while patient preference studies with pazopanib suggested improved tolerability. Yet another class of drug, an anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor named as nivolumab, has been approved for intravenous administration that unleashes the body's immune system so that it can reject the kidney cancer, however, the drug may cause the body to develop an immune reaction against its own tissues thereby leading to wide range of side effects that can be severe or life-threatening. With multiple approved agents available, further research is yet to define the ideal timing, sequencing, and patient profile for a given particular agent.

Although, studies have demonstrated the general tolerability of targeted agents, at most occasions, most patients with RCC inevitably develop resistance to targeted agents after a median of 5-11 months of treatment. Combinations of targeted agents are being evaluated, but toxicity is problematic. Several strategies have been tested to manage the drug resistance including: Adjusting the dose of the drug, combination therapy or switching to an alternative agent. Moreover alternative pathways are currently under investigation particularly targeting of RAF (Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma), MEK (Mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase), and the PI3K (Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase)/AKT (a serine/threonine kinase also known as protein kinase B [PKB]) pathway.

Based on the information available, even though there have been some advancements in the treatment of renal cell carcinomas, the associated complications like the disease stage, the response rate and the accompanying side effects potentially reduce the patient compliance and poses issues which severely affect the progression-free survival (PFS) and/or the overall survival (OS) which is the ultimate treatment goal for a given therapy.

There remains a need for improved and additional methods of treating renal cell carcinoma. There remains a need for additional small-molecule therapeutics for the treatment of renal cancer.

SUMMARY

According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) comprising administration of 5-aminosalicylic acid derivatives like mesalamine.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a pharmaceutical composition comprising mesalamine with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method of treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by administration of mesalamine in combination with one or more additional cancer treatment regimens. The cancer treatment regimen can include administration of one or more additional therapeutic agents, exposure to ionizing radiation, and/or surgical interventions.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a use of mesalamine in combination with one or more therapeutic agents either simultaneously, sequentially, or separately for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In some instances, the therapeutic agent can include one or more chemotherapeutic drugs.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there are provided pharmaceutical compositions and kits including mesalamine and at least one other therapeutic agent.

The details of one or more embodiments are set forth in the descriptions below. Other features, objects, and advantages will be apparent from the description and from the claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 depicts the relative IC₅₀ values (and the mean relative IC₅₀ value) for mesalamine across the human tumor models for renal cancer.

FIG. 2 depicts the absolute IC₅₀ values (and the mean absolute IC₅₀ value) for mesalamine across the human tumor models for renal cancer.

FIG. 3 depicts a concentration-effect curve exhibiting efficacy of mesalamine in human tumor models.

FIG. 4 includes a graphical representation of mean tumor volume across the animal group populations G1 (vehicle), G2 (sunitinib), and G3 (mesalamine).

FIG. 5 includes a graphical representation of mean tumor growth inhibition (in percentage value) across the animal group populations G1 (vehicle), G2 (sunitinib), and G3 (mesalamine).

FIG. 6 includes a graphical representation depicting change in body weights across the animal group population G1 (vehicle), G2 (sunitinib), and G3 (mesalamine).

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Before the present methods and systems are disclosed and described, it is to be understood that the methods and systems are not limited to specific synthetic methods, specific components, or to particular compositions. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting.

As used in the specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Ranges may be expressed herein as from “about” one particular value, and/or to “about” another particular value. When such a range is expressed, another embodiment includes—from the one particular value and/or to the other particular value. Similarly, when values are expressed as approximations, by use of the antecedent “about,” it will be understood that the particular value forms another embodiment. It will be further understood that the endpoints of each of the ranges are significant both in relation to the other endpoint, and independently of the other endpoint.

“Optional” or “optionally” means that the subsequently described event or circumstance may or may not occur, and that the description includes instances where said event or circumstance occurs and instances where it does not.

Throughout the description and claims of this specification, the word “comprise” and variations of the word, such as “comprising” and “comprises,” means “including but not limited to,” and is not intended to exclude, for example, other additives, components, integers or steps. “Exemplary” means “an example of” and is not intended to convey an indication of a preferred or ideal embodiment. “Such as” is not used in a restrictive sense, but for explanatory purposes.

Disclosed are components that can be used to perform the disclosed methods and systems. These and other components are disclosed herein, and it is understood that when combinations, subsets, interactions, groups, etc. of these components are disclosed that while specific reference of each various individual and collective combinations and permutation of these may not be explicitly disclosed, each is specifically contemplated and described herein, for all methods and systems. This applies to all aspects of this application including, but not limited to, steps in disclosed methods. Thus, if there are a variety of additional steps that can be performed it is understood that each of these additional steps can be performed with any specific embodiment or combination of embodiments of the disclosed methods.

Mesalamine is an officially adopted name for the compound 5-amino-2-hydroxybenzoic acid, or 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), and is in a class of medications called anti-inflammatory agents. Mesalamine has been approved for the treatment and management of inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. Mesalamine has the following chemical structure:

As used herein, term “mesalamine” (along with its synonyms mesalazine, 5-aminosalicylic acid and 5-ASA) is denoted in broad sense to include not only mesalamine per se but also its pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives. Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable derivatives include pharmaceutically acceptable salts, pharmaceutically acceptable solvates, pharmaceutically acceptable hydrates, pharmaceutically acceptable anhydrates, pharmaceutically acceptable enantiomers, pharmaceutically acceptable esters, pharmaceutically acceptable polymorphs, pharmaceutically acceptable prodrugs, pharmaceutically acceptable tautomers, pharmaceutically acceptable complexes etc.

Mesalamine may be formulated as a pharmaceutically acceptable salt. Pharmaceutically acceptable salts are salts that retain the desired biological activity of the parent compound and do not impart undesirable toxicological effects. Examples of such salts are acid addition salts formed with inorganic acids, for example, hydrochloric, hydrobromic, sulfuric, phosphoric, and nitric acids and the like; salts formed with organic acids such as acetic, oxalic, tartaric, succinic, maleic, fumaric, gluconic, citric, malic, methanesulfonic, ptoluenesulfonic, napthalenesulfonic, and polygalacturonic acids, and the like; salts formed from elemental anions such as chloride, bromide, and iodide; salts formed from metal hydroxides, for example, sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide, lithium hydroxide, and magnesium hydroxide; salts formed from metal carbonates, for example, sodium carbonate, potassium carbonate, calcium carbonate, and magnesium carbonate; salts formed from metal bicarbonates, for example, sodium bicarbonate and potassium bicarbonate; salts formed from metal sulfates, for example, sodium sulfate and potassium sulfate; and salts formed from metal nitrates, for example, sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate. Pharmaceutically acceptable and non-pharmaceutically acceptable salts may be prepared using procedures well known in the art, for example, by reacting a sufficiently basic compound such as an amine with a suitable acid comprising a physiologically acceptable anion. Alkali metal (for example, sodium, potassium, or lithium) or alkaline earth metal (for example, calcium) salts of carboxylic acids can also be made.

Mesalamine may be formulated as pharmaceutically acceptable prodrugs. Prodrugs can substantially increase the bioavailability of the compounds, permitting more effective oral therapy. In some embodiments, the prodrug is a C₁-C₁₀ alkyl ester of the 1-carboxylic acid, which may or may not be substituted. A preferred substituent is carbonyl-oxy and alkyloxy-carbonyloxy. Exemplary esters include methyl, ethyl, 2-morpholinylethyl, pivaloyloxy-methyl ester, 1-(isopropyloxy-carbonyloxy)ethyl ester, and 1-(acetyloxy)ethyl ester. In some embodiments, the 5-amino group may be converted to a prodrug, for instance a phosphonate, phosphamide, aminomethylenes (—CH₂NR₂), methylene ethers (—CH₂OR) (in each case R is an alkyl group, e.g., a C₁-C₁₀ alkyl, which may or may not be substituted), and the like. In other embodiments, the prodrug is sulfasalazine.

According to the present invention there is provided a pharmaceutical composition comprising mesalamine with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipients for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Mesalamine can be administered according to various dosing regimens. For instance, mesalamine can be administered once a day, twice a day, three times per day, or even more than three times a day. Mesalamine can be administered such that the total daily dose is at least 50 mg, at least 100 mg, at least 250 mg, at least 500 mg, at least 750 mg, at least 1,000 mg, at least 1,250 mg, at least 1,500 mg, at least 1,750 mg, or at least 2,000 mg. In some instances, the total daily dose can be from 5-5,000 mg, 10-5,000 mg, 25-5,000 mg, 50-5,000 mg, 100-5,000 mg, 200-2,500 mg, 500-2,500 mg, 10-2,500 mg, 50-2,500 mg, 100-2,500 mg, 100-2,000 mg, 250-2,000 mg or 500-2,000 mg. In other embodiments, mesalamine can be administered less than once daily, instance, once every two days, once every three days, once every five days, once every seven days, once every ten days, once every fourteen days, once every twenty-eight days or once every month. In some instances, mesalamine can be administered intermittently, for instance for a period of 1-10 days, followed by a period in which no mesalamine is administered (e.g., 1-10 days), followed by another period e.g., 1-10 days, in which mesalamine is administered. The on/off dosing schedule can be repeated as many times as necessary.

Preferably, mesalamine may be provided in the form of a pharmaceutical composition such as, but not limited to, solid unit dosage forms including tablets, capsules (filled with powders, pellets, beads, mini-tablets, pills, micro-pellets, small tablet units, multiple unit pellet systems (MUPS), disintegrating tablets, dispersible tablets, granules, and microspheres, multiparticulates), sachets (filled with powders, pellets, beads, mini-tablets, pills, micro-pellets, small tablet units, MUPS, disintegrating tablets, dispersible tablets, granules, and microspheres, multiparticulates), powders for reconstitution and sprinkles, however, other dosage forms such as controlled release formulations, lyophilized formulations, modified release formulations, delayed release formulations, extended release formulations, pulsatile release formulations, dual release formulations and the like may fall within the scope of the invention. Apart from this, it will be well acknowledged by person skilled in the art to have other forms of pharmaceutical compositions like liquid or semisolid dosage form (liquids, suspensions, solutions, dispersions, ointments, creams, emulsions, microemulsions, sprays, spot-on), injection/parenteral preparations, topical, inhalations, buccal, nasal etc. and which may be envisaged under the ambit of the invention.

Depending on the pathological stage, patient's age and other physiological parameters, size of the tumor, and the extent of invasion, the pharmaceutical composition comprising mesalamine may require specific dosage amounts and specific frequency of administrations. Preferably, on an average, the dose range that may be feasible for producing suitable anticancer effect may range from 25 mg to 3 gms depending on the above factors, and the route of administration adopted for administering the pharmaceutical composition. The dosing frequency that may be required for adherence to the therapy may be at least once, twice or thrice a day depending on the above mentioned factors and the route of administration adopted for administering the pharmaceutical composition.

It will further be well acknowledged by person skilled in the art that by specific treatment with mesalamine, various physicochemical properties could be improved such as solubility, better absorption, bioavailability, increased shelf life, etc. and wherein such specific treatment refers to one or more of micronization and nanosizing techniques which may achieve one or more of the benefits aimed hereinabove, and may also assist in dose reduction. For instance, mesalamine may be present in the form of nanoparticles which have an average particle size of less than 2,000 nm, less than 1,500 nm, less than 1,000 nm, less than 750 nm, less than 500 nm, or less than 250 nm.

Suitable pharmaceutically acceptable excipients may be used for formulating the dosage forms according to the present invention such as, but not limited to, surface stabilizers or surfactants, viscosity modifying agents, polymers including extended release polymers, stabilizers, disintegrants or super disintegrants, diluents, plasticizers, binders, glidants, lubricants, sweeteners, flavoring agents, anti-caking agents, opacifiers, anti-microbial agents, antifoaming agents, emulsifiers, buffering agents, coloring agents, carriers, fillers, anti-adherents, solvents, taste-masking agents, preservatives, antioxidants, texture enhancers, surface stabilizers, channeling agents, coating agents or combinations thereof.

The present inventors have discovered the mesalamine is surprisingly effective for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma. In certain embodiments, mesalamine can be used to treat conventional (clear-cell) renal cell carcinoma, papillary renal cell-carcinoma, chromophobe renal carcinoma, onco-cytoma, or collecting-duct carcinoma. Renal cell carcinoma can be classified in stages, according to the extent of disease progression. The TNM (tumor size/lymph node/metastasis) system includes the following stages of RCC:

Stage I: Tumor of a diameter of 7 cm (approx. 2¾ inches) or smaller, and limited to the kidney, with no lymph node involvement or metastases to distant organs.

Stage II: Tumor larger than 7.0 cm but still limited to the kidney, with no lymph node involvement or metastases to distant organs.

Stage III: Tumor of any size with involvement of a nearby lymph node but no metastases to distant organs. Tumor of this stage may be with or without spread to fatty tissue around the kidney, with or without spread into the large veins leading from the kidney to the heart; or Tumor with spread to fatty tissue around the kidney and/or spread into the large veins leading from the kidney to the heart, but without spread to any lymph nodes or other organs; or Tumor with spread to fatty tissue around the kidney and/or spread into the large veins leading from the kidney to the heart, but without spread to any lymph nodes or other organs.

Stage IV: Tumor that has spread directly through the fatty tissue and the fascia ligament-like tissue that surrounds the kidney; or involvement of more than one lymph node (near or distant from kidney); or distant metastases, such as in the lungs, bone, or brain.

Mesalamine can be used to treat Stage I RCC, Stage II RCC, Stage III RCC, or Stage IV RCC. In some embodiments, mesalamine can reduce tumor size, inhibit tumor growth, alleviate symptoms, delay progression, prolong survival, including, but not limited to disease free survival, prevent or delay RCC metastasis, reduce or eliminate preexisting RCC metastasis, and/or prevent recurrence of RCC. All of these effects fall within the general scope of treating RCC.

As used herein, the term “delay” refers to methods that reduce the probability of disease development/extent in a given time frame, when compared to otherwise similar methods that do not include the use of mesalamine. Probabilities can be established using clinical trials, but can also be determined using in vitro assays when correlations have been established. In some embodiments, mesalamine can inhibit renal cancer cell proliferation. For instance, at least about 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100% of cell proliferation is inhibited. In some embodiments, mesalamine can inhibit renal cancer metastasis. For instance, at least about 10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%, or 100% of metastasis is inhibited.

According to the present invention, there is provided a method of alleviating or treating renal cell carcinoma (RCC) by administration of mesalamine in combination with one or more anti-cancer drugs either simultaneously, sequentially, or separately. In certain embodiments, mesalamine can be administered with:

(A) cytotoxic anti-neoplastic drugs such as nucleoside analogues, antifolates, antimetabolites, topoisomerase I inhibitor, anthracyclines, podophyllotoxins, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, alkylating agents, platinum compounds, proteasome inhibitors, nitrogen mustards & oestrogen analogue; and/or

(B) targeted anti-neoplastic drugs such as monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, retinoids, immunomodulatory agents, histone deacetylase inhibitors, other kinase inhibitors.

In some embodiments, mesalamine may be administered (simultaneously, sequentially or separately) with one or more anti-cancer drugs. Such drugs include small molecule chemical agents and biological agents, including immunotherapies. Examplary anti-cancer drugs include Abiraterone acetate, Methotrexate, Paclitaxel Albumin-stabilized Nanoparticle, Brentuximab Vedotin, Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine, Doxorubicin Hydrochloride, Afatinib Dimaleate, Everolimus, Netupitant, Palonosetron Hydrochloride, Imiquimod, Aldesleukin, Alectinib, Alemtuzumab, Melphalan Hydrochloride, Melphalan, Pemetrexed Disodium, Chlorambucil, Aminolevulinic acid, Anastrozole, Aprepitant, Pamidronate Disodium, Exemestane, Nelarabine, Arsenic Trioxide, Ofatumumab, Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi, Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, Axitinib, Azacitidine, Carmustine, Belinostat, Bendamustine hydrochloride, Bevacizumab, Bexarotene, Tositumomab, Bicalutamide, Bleomycin, Blinatumomab, Blinatumomab, Bortezomib, Bosutinib, Busulfan, Cabazitaxel, Cabozantinib, Alemtuzumab, Irinotecan hydrochloride, Capecitabine, Fluorouracil, Carboplatin, Carfilzomib, Bicalutamide, Lomustine, Ceritinib, Daunorubicin Hydrochloride, Cetuximab, Chlorambucil, Cyclophosphamide, Clofarabine, Cobimetinib, Dactinomycin, Cobimetinib, Crizotinib, Ifosfamide, Ramucirumab, Cytarabine, Dabrafenib, Dacarbazine, Decitabine, Daratumumab, Dasatinib, Daunorubicin hydrochloride, Decitabine, Efibrotide Sodium, Defibrotide sodium, Degarelix, Denileukin Diftitox, Denosumab, Dexamethasone, Dexrazoxane hydrochloride, Dinutuximab, Docetaxel, Doxorubicin Hydrochloride, Dacarbazine, Rasburicase, Epirubicin hydrochloride, Elotuzumab, Oxaliplatin, Eltrombopag olamine, Aprepitant, Elotuzumab, Enzalutamide, Epirubicin Hydrochloride, Cetuximab, Eribulin Mesylate, Vismodegib, Erlotinib hydrochloride, Etoposide, Raloxifene hydrochloride, Melphalan hydrochloride, Toremifene, Panobinostat, Fulvestrant, Letrozole, Filgrastim, Fludarabine phosphate, Flutamide, Methotrexate, Pralatrexate, Recombinant HPV Quadrivalent Vaccine, Recombinant HPV Nonavalent vaccine, Obinutuzumab, Gefitinib, Gemcitabine hydrochloride, Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin, Afatinib Dimaleate, Imatinib Mesylate, Glucarpidase, Goserelin acetate, Eribulin mesylate, Trastuzumab, Topotecan hydrochloride, Palbociclib, Ibritumomab tiuxetan, Ibrutinib, Ponatinib hydrochloride, Idarubicin hydrochloride, Idelalisib, Imiquimod, Axitinib, Recombinant Interferon Alfa-2b, Tositumomab, Ipilimumab, Gefitinib, Romidepsin, Ixabepilone, Ixazomib Citrate, Ruxolitinib phosphate, Cabazitaxel, Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine, Palifermin, Pembrolizumab, Lanreotide Acetate, Lapatinib ditosylate, Lenalidomide Lenvatinib mesylate, Leuprolide acetate, Olaparib, Vincristine Sulfate, Procarbazine hydrochloride, Mechlorethamine hydrochloride, Megestrol Acetate, Trametinib, Mercaptopurine, Temozolomide, Mitoxantrone hydrochloride, Plerixafor, Busulfan, Azacitidine, Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin, Vinorelbine tartrate, Necitumumab, Nelarabine, Sorafenib tosylate, Nilotinib, Ixazomib citrate, Nivolumab, Romiplostim, Obinutuzumab, Ofatumumab, Olaparib, Omacetaxine mepesuccinate, Pegaspargase, Ondansetron hydrochloride, Osimertinib, Panitumumab, Panobinostat, Peginterferon Alfa-2b, Pembrolizumab, Pertuzumab, Plerixafor, Pomalidomide, Ponatinib hydrochloride, Necitumumab, Pralatrexate, Procarbazine hydrochloride, Aldesleukin, Denosumab, Ramucirumab, Rasburicase, Regorafenib, Lenalidomide, Rituximab, Rolapitant hydrochloride, Romidepsin, Ruxolitinib phosphate, Siltuximab, Dasatinib, Sunitinib malate, Thalidomide, Dabrafenib, Osimertinib, Talimogene, Atezolizumab, Temsirolimus, Thalidomide, Dexrazoxane hydrochloride, Trabectedin, Trametinib, Trastuzumab, Lapatinib ditosylate, Dinutuximab, Vandetanib, Rolapitant hydrochloride, Bortezomib, Venetoclax, Crizotinib, Enzalutamide, Ipilimumab, Trabectedin, Ziv-Aflibercept, Idelalisib, Ceritinib.

Mesalamine can be administered with one or more chemotherapeutic agents either simultaneously, sequentially, or separately. In certain cases, mesalamine can be administered for a period of at least 1 week, at least 2 weeks, at least 4 week, at least 6 weeks, at least 8 week, or at least 10 weeks, prior to commencing treatment with additional agents. In some instances, mesalamine and the other agent can be administered intermittently, for instance a period of mesalamine administration, followed by a period in which the other agent to administered, followed by another period of mesalamine administration. The cycle can be repeated as many times as necessary.

In certain cases, the combination of mesalamine and additional agent will exhibit a greater than additive effect (i.e., a synergistic effect). In other instance, the use of mesalamine permits a reduced amount of the other agent to be administered, without a corresponding decrease in therapeutic efficiency.

In cases of combination therapy, it is possible that a unitary dosage form comprising both mesalamine and one or more additional anti-cancer drugs may be employed. In some instances, the combinations may be provided in form of kit preparation wherein mesalamine is present in an oral or parenteral composition and the additional anti-cancer drug therapy may be provided in an oral or parenteral composition. In one embodiment, the kit preparation may be provided in an all oral dosage form presentation wherein both the mesalamine and the additional anti-cancer drug are presented in an oral dosage form. In another embodiment, the kit preparation may be provided as an oral plus parenteral dosage form presentation wherein mesalamine is presented in an oral form and the additional anti-cancer drug is presented in a parenteral form. Alternatively, the kit preparation may be provided wherein mesalamine is presented in a parenteral form and the additional anti-cancer drug is presented in an oral dosage form.

In some instances, mesalamine can be used in combination with ionizing radiation and/or surgical interventions for the treatment of RCC. Mesalamine can be administered before, during, or after treatment with ionizing radiation or surgical intervention. In certain cases, mesalamine can be administered for a period of at least 1 week, at least 2 weeks, at least 4 week, at least 6 weeks, at least 8 week, or at least 10 weeks, prior to commencing treatment with ionizing radiation or surgery. Exemplary forms of radiation include x-rays, gamma rays, electron beams and proton beams. It has been found that administration of mesalamine permits a reduction in the total exposure of the patient to ionizing radiation, without a corresponding reduction in therapeutic efficiency. In certain instances, mesalamine can be administered both prior and subsequent to ionizing radiation and/or surgical interventions. For instance, mesalamine can be administered for a period of at least 1 week, at least 2 weeks, at least 4 week, at least 6 weeks, at least 8 week, or at least 10 weeks, following treatment with ionizing radiation or surgery.

EXAMPLES

The following examples are set forth below to illustrate the methods and results according to the disclosed subject matter. These examples are not intended to be inclusive of all aspects of the subject matter disclosed herein, but rather to illustrate representative methods, compositions, and results. These examples are not intended to exclude equivalents and variations of the present invention, which are apparent to one skilled in the art.

Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy with respect to numbers (e.g., amounts, temperature, etc.) but some errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unless indicated otherwise, parts are parts by weight, temperature is in ° C. or is at ambient temperature, and pressure is at or near atmospheric. There are numerous variations and combinations of reaction conditions, e.g., component concentrations, temperatures, pressures, and other reaction ranges and conditions that can be used to optimize the product purity and yield obtained from the described process. Only reasonable and routine experimentation will be required to optimize such process conditions.

Example 1

In the present study, mesalamine was characterized for their ability to inhibit anchorage independent growth and ex vivo colony formation of tumor cells in semi-solid medium. Mesalamine was tested against 10 human tumor xenograft-derived cell suspensions or tumor cell lines of renal cancer. Test concentrations ranged from 0.0698 mM to 3 mM.

Mesalamine inhibited colony formation in a concentration-dependent manner with a mean relative IC₅₀ value of 1,207 μM (1,263 μM). Bottom plateaus of the concentration-effect curves of responding tumor models were in the range from 0 to 18%, indicating clear inhibition of tumor colony growth in the selected test range.

Clonogenic Assay Cultivation of Cell Lines

Cell lines were routinely passaged one or twice weekly. All cells were grown at 37° C. in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO₂ in RPMI 1640 medium (Biochrom) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum and 0.1 mg/mL gentamicin. The percentage of viable cells was determined in a Neubauer-hemocytometer using trypan blue exclusion.

Preparation of Single Cell Suspensions from Human Tumor Xenografts

Tumor xenografts (patient-derived, as well as cell line-derived xenografts) were passaged as subcutaneous xenografts in NMRI nu/nu mice. At a tumor volume of 400-1000 mm³ tumor-bearing mice were sacrificed and tumors were collected under sterile conditions without delay according to the relevant Oncotest SOPs and the relevant animal welfare guidelines published by the FELASA and the GV-SOLAS. Tumors were mechanically disaggregated and subsequently incubated with an enzyme cocktail consisting of collagenase type IV (41 U/mL), DNase I (125 U/mL), hyaluronidase type III (100 U/mL), and dispase II (1.0 U/mL) in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies) at 37° C. for 60-120 minutes. Cells were passed through sieves of 100 μm and 40 μm mesh size (Cell Strainer, BD Falcon™), and washed with RPMI 1640 medium. The percentage of viable cells was determined in a Neubauer-hemocytometer using trypan blue exclusion. Aliquots of the cells were frozen down, and stored in liquid nitrogen. On each day of an experiment, a frozen aliquot of tumor cells was thawed and used for preparation of assay plates.

Clonogenic Assay Procedure

The clonogenic assay was carried out in a 96 well plate format using ultra low attachment plates. For each test, cells were prepared as described above and assay plates were prepared as follows: each test well contained a layer of semi-solid medium with tumor cells (50 μL), and a second layer of medium supernatant with or without test compound (100 μL). The cell layer consisted of 2.5·10³ to 1·10⁴ tumor cells per well, which were seeded in 50 μL/well cell culture medium (IMDM, supplemented with 20% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 0.01% (w/v) gentamicin, and 0.4% (w/v) agar). After 24 hours, the test compounds were added after serial dilution in cell culture medium, and left on the cells for the duration of the experiment (continuous exposure, 100 μl drug overlay). Every plate included six untreated control wells and drug-treated groups in duplicate at 9 concentrations. Cultures were incubated at 37° C. and 7.5% CO₂ in a humidified atmosphere for 8 to 13 days and monitored closely for colony growth using an inverted microscope. Within this period, ex vivo tumor growth led to the formation of colonies with a diameter of >50 μm. At the time of maximum colony formation, counts were performed with an automatic image analysis system (Celllnsight NXT, Thermo Scientific). 48 hours prior to evaluation, vital colonies were stained with a sterile aqueous solution of 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyltetrazolium chloride (1 mg/ml, 100 μl/well).

The ability of mesalamine to inhibit ex vivo colony formation of cells with the ability to grow anchorage-independently in semi-solid medium was examined in 10 tumor models of renal cancer.

Mesalamine inhibited colony formation in a concentration-dependent manner with a mean relative IC₅₀ value of 1,207 μM (1,263 μM).

In-Vivo Animal Efficacy Study

Objective

The objective of this study was to evaluate the in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of mesalamine alone and in combination with standard-of-care, sunitinib in xenograft model using Human renal cell carcinoma cell line (A498)

Methodology

Healthy 10 female athymic nude mice were recruited for the donor cell inoculation. Animals were subcutaneously injected at flank region with 10 million A498 cells suspended in 200 μl of media and matrigel. Animals were monitored for solid tumor growth. Once the tumor reaches ˜500 mm³, donor animals were humanely sacrificed and tumors were collected under aseptic condition. Tumors were fragmented in to ˜30 mg size.

After one week of acclimatization, female athymic nude mice were subcutaneously implanted with ˜30 mg tumor fragments using the device trocar. Animals were observed for tumor growth for next three weeks. Tumor bearing animals were selected from the experimental animals and grouped on basis of tumor size, into six groups containing 7 animals in each group.

Group G1 animals served as a vehicle control, which received 10 mL/kg, p.o. of 0.5% CMC in water; whereas Group 2 served as the standard, which received 20 mg/kg (Sub-therapeutic dose) of Sunitinib. Group 3 received mesalamine at 250 mg/kg.

Group Treatment Dose, Route & Regimen No. of Animals G1 Vehicle,  10 mL/kg, p.o. q.d. × 21 7 0.5% CMC G2 Sunitinib  20 mg/kg, p.o. q.d. × 21 7 (Sub-therapeutic dose) G3 Mesalamine 250 mg/kg, p.o. q.d. × 21 7

Tumor Measurement

The tumor sizes were measured weekly twice from the date of tumor appearance till the end of the experiment. Tumor size was measured by digital vernier caliper (MITUTOYO) by measuring length (L=longest axis) and width (W=shortest axis).

Tumor volume was calculated according to the formula L×W²/2 (Unit: mm³), where, L=length of tumor (mm) and W=width of tumor (mm). From the tumor volume data mean tumor volume and % tumor growth inhibition (% TGI) were determined. Mesalamine by itself shows anti-tumor efficacy, inhibiting tumor formation by more than 50% at the dose tested, and the anti-tumor efficacy of mesalamine is comparable to sunitinib. None of the treatment shows any significant change in body weights.

Mean Tumor Volume

G2, Sunitinib G3, Mesalamine G1, Vehicle control (20 mg/kg) (250 mg/kg) Days Mean SEM Mean SEM Mean SEM 1 147.56 20.68 145.40 29.19 145.26 29.30 6 331.93 79.52 174.90 37.07 161.68 26.47 9 463.77 110.07 261.95 66.94 250.41 63.08 13 617.07 146.04 340.62 93.64 301.82 103.16 16 961.26 226.49 448.05 121.72 501.10 160.99 20 1280.51 295.87 630.25 215.72 536.78 195.78

Mean Tumor Growth Inhibition

G1, Vehicle G2, Sunitinib G3, Mesalamine Days control (20 mg/kg) (250 mg/kg) 1 0 1.47 1.56 6 0 47.31 51.29 9 0 43.52 46.01 13 0 44.80 51.09 16 0 53.39 47.87 20 0 50.78 58.08

Example 2: Pharmaceutical Compositions

Manufacturing formula for a pharmaceutical composition envisaged under the present invention can be referred herein below:

Ingredients Qty/tab (mg) Dry Mix Mesalamine 400-1200 Anhydrous Lactose 55-165 Binder solution Povidone/Hypromellose/Hydroxy Propyl 22.5-67.50 Cellulose Isopropyl Alcohol q.s Purified water q.s Blending Sodium starch glycolate/Crospovidone/  7.5-22.50 Croscarmellose Sodium Colloidal anhydrous silica 5-15 Purified talc 5-15 Lubrication Magnesium stearate/Stearic acid 5-15 Total 500-1500

Seal Coating:

Ingredients Qty/tab (mg) Hypromellose  5-15 Polyethylene Glycol 0.5-1.5 Isopropyl alcohol q.s Dichloromethane q.s

Enteric Coating:

Ingredients Qty/tab (mg) Methacrylic acid copolymer (Eudragit 30-90  S100/Eudragit L 100) Purified Talc 7.50-22.50 Triethyl citrate 7.00-21.00 Isopropyl alcohol q.s Acetone q.s

Film Coating:

Ingredients Qty/tab (mg) Opadry color composition  10-30.00 Purified Water q.s. Total 560-1680 mg

Manufacturing Process:

(I) Dry Mixing:

i) Ingredients 1 & 2 were sifted through specified sieves

ii) Presifted ingredients were loaded in suitable granulator and were mixed to form a dry mix

(II) Binder Preparation & Granulation:

iii) Povidone/Hypromellose/Hydroxy propyl Cellulose were dissolved in Isopropyl Alcohol & water under stirring, and the solution was stirred until a clear solution was obtained.

iv) Dry mix of step ii) above was granulated using the binder solution until proper consistency of the wet mass was obtained in the granulator.

(III) Drying & Milling:

v) The wet milled mass obtained at step iv was loaded in a dryer and the granules so obtained were dried

vi) The dried granules so obtained were sifted through specified sieves.

(IV) Blending:

viii) The above obtained granules were blended in octagonal suitable blender at suitable RPM with sodium starch glycolate/Crospovidone/sodium carboxy Methyl

Cellulose/Croscarmellose Sodium, Colloidal Silicon dioxide and Purified Talc.

(V) Lubrication & Compression:

ix) The presifted magnesium stearate/stearic acid were loaded in octagonal blender and the blend was lubricated for suitable time followed by compression of the granules to form tablets.

(VI) Coating:

x) The compressed tablets obtained above were seal coated using Hypromellose and PEG solution followed by enteric coating of the seal coated tablets using Eudragit S 100/Eudragit L 100 solution along with Triethyl citrate, talc keeping appropriate in-process parameters, and finally, film coated the above enteric coated tablets with Opadry color solution.

Manufacturing Formula II:

Ingredients Qty/tab (mg) Granulation I Dry Mix Mesalamine  400-1200 Microcrystalline Cellulose (Avicel PH 101) 3-9 Sodium starch glycolate/Crospovidone/ 2-6 Croscarmellose Sodium Sodium carboxy Methyl Cellulose  5-15 Bees Wax  5-15 Binder solution Purified water q.s Granulation II III. Dry Mix Mesalamine Granules  410-1230 Microcrystalline Cellulose (Avicel PH 101) 10-30 Hpromellose/Hydroxy Propyl Cellulose 20-60 Colloidal anhydrous silica 2-6 sodium starch glycolate/Crospovidone/ 2-6 Croscarmellose Sodium Binder solution Povidone/Hypromellose/Hydroxy Propyl 3-9 Cellulose/sodium carboxy Methyl Cellulose Purified Water q.s. Lubrication Magnesium stearate/Stearic acid 3-9 Total  455-1365

Seal Coating:

Ingredients Qty/tab (mg) Hypromellose  5-15 Polyethylene Glycol 0.5-1.5 Isopropyl alcohol q.s Dichloromethane q.s

Enteric Coating:

Ingredients Qty/tab (mg) Methacrylic acid copolymer (Eudragit 25.0-75.0  S100/Eudragit L 100) Purified Talc 5.0-15.0 Triethyl citrate 3.5-10.5 Isopropyl alcohol q.s Acetone q.s

Film Coating:

Ingredients Qty/tab (mg) Opadry color composition  6.0-18.0 Purified Water q.s. Total 560-1680 mg

Manufacturing Process:

(I) Granulation I:

1) Dry Mixing:

i) Ingredients 1 to 5 were sifted through specified sieves and loaded in a suitable granulator. A dry mix was formed by mixing the presifted ingredients for 5 mins.

2) Binder preparation & granulation:—

i) The dry mix obtained above was granulated using Purified water as binder solution till proper consistency of wet mass was obtained in suitable granulator.

3) Drying:

i) The wet mass obtained above was sized & the granules so obtained were dried.

(II) Granulation II:

4) Sifting:

i) The ingredients 7 to 10 were sifted through specified mesh & loaded into suitable granulator.

ii) The dried granules obtained in 3) were then loaded into the granulator along with the materials obtained above in 4 i).

5) Binder preparation & granulation:—

i) Povidone/Hypromellose/Hydroxy propyl Cellulose/Sodium Carboxy Methyl Cellulose were dissolved in water under stirring, and were continuously stirred until a clear solution was obtained.

ii) The dry mix of step 4) was granulated using the above binder solution until proper consistency of wet mass was obtained

6) Drying & milling:

i) The wet mass was sized & the granules were dried. The dried granules were sifted through suitable sieves.

7) Lubrication & Compression:

i) The presifted Magnesium Stearate/Stearic Acid were loaded in a suitable Blender & the granules were lubricated for suitable time followed by compression of the granules to form tablets

8) Coating:

i) The compressed tablets obtained above were seal coated using Hypromellose and PEG solution followed by enteric coating of the seal coated tablets using Eudragit S 100/Eudragit L 100 solution along with Triethyl citrate, talc keeping appropriate in-process parameters, and finally, film coated the above enteric coated tablets with Opadry color solution.

The compositions and methods of the appended claims are not limited in scope by the specific compositions and methods described herein, which are intended as illustrations of a few aspects of the claims and any compositions and methods that are functionally equivalent are intended to fall within the scope of the claims. Various modifications of the compositions and methods in addition to those shown and described herein are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. Further, while only certain representative compositions and method steps disclosed herein are specifically described, other combinations of the compositions and method steps also are intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims, even if not specifically recited. Thus, a combination of steps, elements, components, or constituents may be explicitly mentioned herein or less, however, other combinations of steps, elements, components, and constituents are included, even though not explicitly stated. The term “comprising” and variations thereof as used herein is used synonymously with the term “including” and variations thereof and are open, non-limiting terms. Although the terms “comprising” and “including” have been used herein to describe various embodiments, the terms “consisting essentially of” and “consisting of” can be used in place of “comprising” and “including” to provide for more specific embodiments of the invention and are also disclosed. Other than in the examples, or where otherwise noted, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, reaction conditions, and so forth used in the specification and claims are to be understood at the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, to be construed in light of the number of significant digits and ordinary rounding approaches. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma in a patient, the method comprising administering to said patient mesalamine, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt or prodrug thereof, in an amount effective to treat renal cell carcinoma.
 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the renal cell carcinoma comprises treat conventional (clear-cell) renal cell carcinoma, papillary renal cell-carcinoma, chromophobe renal carcinoma, onco-cytoma, or collecting-duct carcinoma.
 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the renal cell carcinoma comprises Stage I, Stage II, Stage III or Stage IV renal cell carcinoma.
 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein mesalamine is administered in combination with at least one other cancer therapy.
 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the additional cancer therapy comprises surgery, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or ionizing radiation.
 6. The method according to claim 5, wherein the additional cancer therapy comprises administering at least one additional agent comprising a nucleoside analogue, antifolate, antimetabolite, topoisomerase I inhibitor, anthracycline, podophyllotoxin, taxanes, vinca alkaloid, alkylating agent, platinum compound, proteasome inhibitor, nitrogen mustard, oestrogen analogue, monoclonal antibody, tyrosine kinase inhibitor, mTOR inhibitor, retinoid, immunomodulatory agent, histone deacetylase inhibitor, or other kinase inhibitor.
 7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the at least one additional agent is administered simultaneously with mesalamine.
 8. The method according to claim 6, wherein the at least one additional agent is administered sequentially with mesalamine.
 9. The method according to claim 6, wherein the at least one additional agent is administered separately from mesalamine.
 10. The method according to claim 4, wherein the mesalamine is administered prior to treatment with ionizing radiation.
 11. The method according to claim 4, wherein the mesalamine is administered subsequent to treatment with ionizing radiation.
 12. The method according to claim 4, wherein the mesalamine is administered prior to surgical treatment for renal cell carcinoma.
 13. The method according to claim 4, wherein the mesalamine is administered subsequent to surgical treatment for renal cell carcinoma.
 14. A pharmaceutical composition comprising mesalamine and at least one additional renal cell carcinoma therapeutic agent.
 15. A kit comprising mesalamine and at least one additional renal cell carcinoma therapeutic agent.
 16. The kit according to claim 15, wherein the mesalamine is provided in a pharmaceutical composition suitable for oral administration.
 17. The kit according to claim 15, wherein the mesalamine is provided in a pharmaceutical composition suitable for parenteral administration. 